
Christian, Electronics Engineer, play piano & guitar, now interested in self-sustaining lifestyle
(2/2) Over all the years in which I’ve done food science testing, method development, patents, analytical papers / posters, etc., the big takeaway is that too many people panic over super low trace levels of things, when that panic is not justified. The concentration determines the safety vs toxicity. Not the mere presence of one molecule or one atom. This is also why bird flu testing and covid testing via PCR is a fraud, because it just tests “positive” without any meaningful concentration or “quantitation” (as we say in the lab) information. Some milk testing “positive” for bird flu is just as meaningless as some activist claiming green beans tested “positive” for glyphosate. These claims are meaningless. If you are a journalist or writer covering these topics, please don’t spread panic over non-quantitation claims that something tested “positive” for some contaminant. Instead, demand quantitation data, and then determine whether the concentration is toxic at that reported level. Without quant data, it’s scientifically meaningless.
@HealthRanger - and we can strike back by saying "mRNA covid 'vaccines' test super-positive for SV40", lol