
- Web Page
- <a rel="me" resistancechicks.com
Hey y'all, Leah and Michelle here! We're just a couple of sisters who own an urban farm in Ohio. We hope to offer you REAL, relevant news, with maybe a few laughs on the side. We want to empower you, the Resistance, with tools to stand up against tyranny from all sides. As we always say, "we don't lean to the Right and we don't lean to the Left... we lean on the Word of God." So everything you hear from us will be filtered through that. We stand for a righteous America, the one our Founding Fath
PG here, Extra Addition "A Letter if Concerning Toleration," Day 37,
Page 22 of 40 of the PDF. If you are following along in the book "John Locke's "The Second Treatise of Government And A Letter Concerning Toleration," Dover Thrifty Edition, we are on page 135 in the middle of the second paragraph. I am using a PDF to copy and paste.
This page deals with an issue Americans struggle with today. Religious Freedom. It has been twisted to allow gruesome murders, molestations, sex trafficking, and mutilations of children. All are abominations to true law, which is to protect each person's, even a woman's or child's, right to themselves, their minds, goods, preservation of their life, liberty, freedom, and body. No one has a right to molest or do harm to another being. Anywhere in the entire world.
excerpt: In the next place: As the magistrate has no power to impose by his laws the use of any rites and ceremonies in any Church, so neither has he any***You will say, by this rule, if some congregations should have a mind to sacrifice infants, or (as the primitive Christians were falsely accused) lustfully pollute themselves in promiscuous uncleanness, or practise any other such heinous enormities, is the magistrate obliged to tolerate them, because they are committed in a religious assembly? I answer: No. These things are not lawful in the ordinary course of life, nor in any private house; and therefore neither are they so in the worship of God or in any religious meeting. But, indeed, if any people congregated upon account of religion should be desirous to sacrifice a calf, I deny that that ought to be prohibited by a law. Meliboeus, whose calf it is, may lawfully kill his calf at home, and burn any part of it that he thinks fit. For no injury is thereby done to any one, no prejudice to another man’s goods. And for the same reason he may kill his calf also in a religious meeting. Whether the doing so be well-pleasing to God or no, it is their part to consider that do it. The part of the magistrate is only to take care that the commonwealth receive no prejudice, and that there be no injury done to any man, either in life or estate***